We’re Asking an Appeals Court to Require a Warrant for ALPR Searches

Today, along with the ACLU, EFF filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit court of appeals in United States v. Sturdivant , a case where police warrantlessly tracked a suspect’s movements using Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) data. Our brief details the vast, interconnected network of ALPRs that constantly track drivers around the country and argues that this tracking is a “ ” under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Sturdivant involves a series of robberies in and around Cleveland, Ohio. Using surveillance camera footage, police identified the make, model, and color of the robber’s car, but they did not know its license plate number. After running an open-ended of two ALPR databases, Flock and ELSAG, officers learned a car belonging to the defendant had been tracked near sites of the robberies, eventually leading to his arrest. Faced with a motion to suppress the ALPR evidence, the district court held that Mr. Sturdivant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his license plate number because it could be observed by members of the public, and that therefore he had no Fourth Amendment interest in not having his car tracked in public places.

Today, along with the ACLU, EFF filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit court of appeals in United States v. Sturdivant , a case where police warrantlessly tracked a suspect’s movements using Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) data. Our brief details the vast, interconnected network of ALPRs that constantly track drivers around the country and argues that this tracking is a “ ” under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

Sturdivant involves a series of robberies in and around Cleveland, Ohio. Using surveillance camera footage, police identified the make, model, and color of the robber’s car, but they did not know its license plate number. After running an open-ended of two ALPR databases, Flock and ELSAG, officers learned a car belonging to the defendant had been tracked near sites of the robberies, eventually leading to his arrest. Faced with a motion to suppress the ALPR evidence, the district court held that Mr. Sturdivant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his license plate number because it could be observed by members of the public, and that therefore he had no Fourth Amendment interest in not having his car tracked in public places.