Skip to content
Macau Sentences Ex-Lawmaker Under National Security Law

Macau Sentences Ex-Lawmaker Under National Security Law

First seen 6 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC • •

Article Content

Browse articles
ThreatCluster AI
ThreatCluster •November 6, 2026 at 11:19 UTC
  • •Au Kam San sentenced to 12 years for subversion under Macau's National Security Law.
  • •First prosecution under the enhanced National Security Law enacted in 2023.
  • •Court found Au guilty of collaborating with foreign organizations to undermine state power.

On November 6, 2026, Macau's Court of First Instance sentenced former lawmaker Au Kam San to 12 years and six months in prison for subversion of state power and other charges under the National Security Law. The court found Au guilty of establishing links with external organizations to endanger national security and breaching confidentiality by disclosing information from a closed Legislative Assembly meeting. His trial was notable as it marked the first case prosecuted under the enhanced National Security Law enacted in 2023. Au's activities reportedly included collaborating with foreign entities to disseminate information that incited hatred against the Chinese government. Despite being acquitted of two additional subversion charges due to insufficient evidence, the ruling has raised concerns about the shrinking civic space in Macau. The Chinese Foreign Ministry defended the legal proceedings, emphasizing accountability for actions threatening national security.

Start a free Starter trial for enhanced analysis

Ask AI about this cluster

Timeline

2025-07-01
Au Kam San arrested
Au was arrested on suspicion of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security.
France24
2026-11-06
Au Kam San sentenced
Former lawmaker received 12 years and six months for subversion and related charges under the National Security Law.
Aa.Tr

More articles in this cluster (2)

Common questions

What charges was Au Kam San convicted of?
Au was convicted of subversion of state power, establishing links with external organizations, and breaching confidentiality.
What is the significance of this case?
This case is significant as it is the first prosecution under the enhanced National Security Law in Macau, highlighting the tightening of political freedoms.
How has the international community reacted?
The articles do not specify international reactions, but the case has raised concerns about human rights and civic space in Macau.