7
On 22 January 2013, the Republic of the Philippines instituted arbitral proceedings against the People’s Republic of China under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the “Convention”). The arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of maritime entitlements in the South China Sea, the status of certain maritime features in the South China Sea, and the lawfulness of certain actions by China in the South China Sea that the Philippines alleged to be in violation of the Convention. China adopted a position of non-acceptance and non-participation in the proceedings. The Permanent Court of Arbitration served as Registry in this arbitration.
Multilateral treaty UNCLOS
Judge Thomas A. Mensah (President) Judge Jean-Pierre Cot Judge Stanislaw Pawlak Professor Alfred H. Soons Judge Rüdiger Wolfrum
Agent Solicitor General Jose. C. Calida (replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay as of 30 June 2016, who replaced Solicitor General Francis H. Jardeleza, as of 2 March 2015) Office of the Solicitor General, Makati, Republic of the Philippines
Paul S. Reichler Lawrence H. Martin Andrew B. Loewenstein Foley Hoag LLP
Professor Bernard H. Oxman University of Miami School of Law Professor Philippe Sands QC Matrix Chambers Professor Alan Boyle Essex Court Chambers
China did not appoint an agent. In a Note Verbale to the PCA on 1 August 2013, and throughout the arbitration proceedings, China reiterated “its position that it does not accept the arbitration initiated by the Philippines.”
In accordance with Article 15(2) of the Rules of Procedure, at the request of the Arbitral Tribunal, the Registry is making arrangements for the preparation of unofficial Chinese translations of the awards rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal.
The full story
This article is one source in a clustered incident — the cluster page carries the summary, timeline and every other outlet covering it.
