Back Cloud.Google Cloud CISO Perspectives: Introducing new $250000 tier for Google Cloud VRP (Q&A)
Welcome to the second Cloud CISO Perspectives for October 2026. Today, Chris Betz talks with Michael Cote, our vulnerability rewards program lead, the new tier of our Cloud VRP program and the current state of vulnerability rewards.
Why we've created a new $250,000 tier for Google Cloud VRP (Q&A)
The Google Cloud Vulnerability Reward Program (VRP) partners with the global security research community to help elevate cloud security for all by encouraging the discovery of critical software vulnerabilities. In an era when automated research has made it more challenging to verify authentic vulnerabilities, we have a critical need to boost high-level, human-led research that can transcend automated-only discovery.
Today, we are expanding our top reward tier with a new $250,000 Root-in-Cloud reward , specifically designed to recognize high-impact architectural research. Identifying tenant-isolation bypasses and complex cross-service logic flaws requires human creativity, intuition, and rigorous systems analysis combined with the power of agentic systems.
To earn this premier reward, you must demonstrate full administrative control, the equivalent of “roles/owner” or complete IAM control, over arbitrary Google Cloud organizations or projects with no prior access or special project setup.
The exploit path can not depend on:
Pre-existing access or footholds in the victim project.
Leaked, phished, or stolen credentials.
User interaction or social engineering.
Proof-of-root: Clear, cryptographic validation
To make testing safe, clear, and reproducible, without impacting production environments, we have defined technical criteria for validating root-in-cloud access .
Additionally, valid vulnerability reports demonstrating remote code execution (RCE) in underlying Google production infrastructure (Borg) or achieving root-in-prod will automatically be evaluated by the Google Cloud VRP panel for root-in-cloud eligibility.
Because code execution in Borg has the potential to impact service availability or cross-tenant data, researchers must halt all probing immediately upon achieving any execution in Borg. Escalation, extracting production credentials, and lateral movement are not allowed and will result in researcher disqualification.
The Google Cloud VRP panel will analyze the initial entry point, execution context, and attack surface to determine whether full arbitrary tenant or project takeover is achievable from that position, and award the bounty accordingly.
This new bounty tier reflects how security research continues to evolve, and the importance of continuing to recognize the most innovative and valuable security research. As part of those efforts, Google Security held its annual Escal8 conference in Singapore last week, and I had the opportunity to the changing landscape with Michael Cote, Google Cloud’s vulnerability reward program lead.
The following transcript has been lightly edited.
Chris Betz : You are at Escal8 in Singapore announcing the new $250,000 Root-in-Cloud tier for our VRP. Why introduce this tier now, and what kind of research are you hoping to spark?
Michael Cote : This is a recognition of how the field of security research has changed over the past year. We value quality submissions from anyone, and we’ve seen that the combination of human creativity and agentic power is much richer than either on its own.
While automated scanners generate a high volume of low-impact noise, first-time researchers who pair human intuition with agentic tools are finding, on average, more interesting bugs than novices did two years ago. With the new Root-in-Cloud tier, we want to challenge the community and increasingly reward the complex, high-impact findings — like tenant-isolation bypasses and cross-service logic flaws — that require deep architectural intuition alongside agentic tools, because getting that information is essential to protecting our customers.
Chris Betz : Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) recently shared research showing that monthly CVE disclosures have doubled as agentic tools mature. From your seat leading the Cloud VRP, how has automation technology impacted the reports we’ve received?
Michael Cote : It has transformed our intake volume, though not in the way many people assume. While the number of valid vulnerability reports submitted to the Google Cloud VRP has remained stable over the last 18 months, the total number of reports has grown tremendously.
Automation has helped democratize vulnerability discovery, and the barrier to entry has been rapidly flattening, something even our top researchers noted at Escal8. Because we’re seeing more researchers and more first-timers with interesting bugs, that creates pressure on more experienced researchers to move faster and bring more impactful findings — although their experience continues to be a key differentiator in success.
Chris Betz : I’ve been working with the research community for more than 20 years. One of the things I appreciate most is how much the community values making the world more secure. Bounty programs let us recognize this valuable work. How do you see the community changing as we move further into the agentic era?
Michael Cote : That shared commitment to making the world more secure is still the heart of this community, which is why the pressure to move faster is something we have to watch closely. As our GTIG colleagues found, the sharpest rise in the number of exploited vulnerabilities comes from n-days, not zero-days .
Open source accounts have suggested that threat actors are using LLMs to rapidly turn newly-public vulnerability details into working exploits. When triage teams are already working through a surge in report volume, disclosing an unmitigated vulnerability well ahead of the standard 90-day coordinated disclosure window gives attackers the exact knowledge and time window they need to target customers.
With the influx of new submissions, I worry a growing pressure to rush to publish. Something that concerns me because we’re already seeing early indications of it. Because LLMs lower the barrier to finding bugs in source-available software, researchers worry that waiting to verify risks will allow someone else to be first to publish. Even more concerning, that same competitive pressure can tempt even established security companies to disclose unmitigated vulnerabilities without coordination, and that rush puts our users directly at risk.
Project Zero helped establish the industry’s 90-plus-30-day responsible disclosure policy, and autonomous detection and exploitation capabilities make following coordinated disclosure more important than ever. In the long run, rushing to be first works against a security company's own self-interest. Novel discoveries may bring temporary visibility, but customers will ultimately choose not to work with organizations that put them and the broader ecosystem at risk.
Chris Betz : When you offer a $250,000 bounty, how do you make sure researchers can validate their findings without putting customer environments or service availability at risk?
Michael Cote : High incentives require clear, safe rules of engagement. We never want researchers testing exploits against real customer projects. Instead, we created a deterministic proof-of-root mechanism using a designated service account. Researchers can cryptographically prove unauthorized access against that identity.
We’ve also updated our program rules to establish strict boundaries around underlying production infrastructure. If researchers think they are close to a breakthrough but are uncertain where the boundary lies, we encourage them to reach out. We are always more than happy to work with them to ensure they are recognized and rewarded for the value of their research without taking steps that would invalidate the bounty.
Chris Betz : What should enterprise CISOs take away from these trends? Especially those who run their own vulnerability management pipelines and partner with external researchers, what advice would you offer for navigating this AI inflection point?
Michael Cote : First, prepare your vulnerability triage workflows for agent-generated submissions. To keep valid reports from getting stuck in a backlog, security teams need ways to separate plausible-sounding hallucinations from real security risks.
Second, compress your remediation timelines once a vulnerability becomes public. Defensive patching and mitigations have to move faster because autonomous technology compresses the time from disclosure to working exploits.
Finally, hold your security partners and vendors to high standards of coordinated disclosure. It’s important that our industry continues to normalize agentic vulnerability research , but we must do so responsibly. Let’s continue to keep user safety at the center of everything we do.
For more information on the Google Cloud VRP, including detailed endpoint specifications, JSON payloads, and CLI examples, please check out our rules page .
In case you missed it
Here are the latest updates, products, services, and resources from our security teams so far this month:
Please visit the Google Cloud blog for more security stories published this month .
Threat Intelligence news
Please visit the Google Cloud blog for more threat intelligence stories published this month .
Now hear this: Podcasts from Google Cloud
Cloud Security Podcast: Patching browsers with AI, agents, Rust, and your tabs : Jasika Bawa and Doug Turner of Chrome Security explore how Google Chrome now uses AI agents to autonomously identify and patch security vulnerabilities at an unprecedented scale, significantly accelerating the browser's update cadence. Listen here .
Cloud Security Podcast: Patching browsers with AI, agents, Rust, and your tabs : Jasika Bawa and Doug Turner of Chrome Security explore how Google Chrome now uses AI agents to autonomously identify and patch security vulnerabilities at an unprecedented scale, significantly accelerating the browser's update cadence. Listen here .
Cloud Security Podcast: All Project Atlas, Wiz's AI vulnerability research : Nir Orfeld, head of vulnerability research, Wiz, discusses how his team uses multi-agent AI systems for discovering high-impact zero-day vulnerabilities in cloud infrastructure. Listen here .
Cloud Security Podcast: All Project Atlas, Wiz's AI vulnerability research : Nir Orfeld, head of vulnerability research, Wiz, discusses how his team uses multi-agent AI systems for discovering high-impact zero-day vulnerabilities in cloud infrastructure. Listen here .
Cloud Security Podcast: How Google eliminates classes of vulnerabilities at scale : How do you build the foundations for a secure Google-scale enterprise that stays secure even if an AI is writing the code and nobody has time to review it? Christoph Kern, principal security engineer, Google, explores what secure-by-design really means in the AI era. Listen here .
Cloud Security Podcast: How Google eliminates classes of vulnerabilities at scale : How do you build the foundations for a secure Google-scale enterprise that stays secure even if an AI is writing the code and nobody has time to review it? Christoph Kern, principal security engineer, Google, explores what secure-by-design really means in the AI era. Listen here .
Scale agents securely with IAM Helper Agent Skills and MCP Tools
Responding to core PHP vulnerabilities CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619
Hardware-backed security at global scale: Confidential G4 with NVIDIA Blackwell is GA
Announcing Wiz Runtime Sensor add-on for GKE: Turnkey threat detection for Kubernetes
By Daniel L’Hommedieu • 5-minute read
The full story
This article is one source in a clustered incident — the cluster page carries the summary, timeline and every other outlet covering it.
