[On-point] USFK chief's remarks raise concerns over wartime operational control transfer

Recent by the commander of U.S. Forces Korea have sparked concerns over differences between the allies on the conditions for transferring wartime operational control of South Korean troops from the U.S. to South Korea. For more, we're joined today by Professor Brian Myers, North Korea analyst and professor at Dongseo University. 1. The commander of U.S. Forces Korea recently said the security environment and operational plans had changed since the allies established requirements for transferring wartime operational control, suggesting "new standards" may be needed. What does this tell us Washington's position on the transfer? 2. But South Korea aims to complete the OPCON transfer by 2028, or even earlier. And the defense ministry says it will stick to an existing agreement on conditions for the transfer. So there are growing concerns that the transfer of wartime operational control could once again be delayed indefinitely. How realistic is Seoul's timeline? 3. Seoul and Washington are reportedly planning to hold their annual Security Consultative Meeting, or SCM, in December, after the U.S. midterms. How could the election results influence the wartime control transfer process and the two allies' approach to it? 4. Beyond the technical military requirements, how could the ongoing debate over the wartime control transfer affect the broader South Korea-U.S. alliance? Alright, Professor Myers, thanks for coming on today.

Reporter Bae Eun-ji [email protected]

공공누리 '제1유형: 출처명시' 조건 및 'AI유형: 인공지능 학습 가능' 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. AI유형은 기사 본문 스크립트에 한하며 영상·사진·음원·자료화면 등은 제외합니다.