Back Kucoin The Squid security incident was caused by a vulnerability in the Safe Wallet module.
ChainCatcher report: Yu Xian, founder of SlowMist, posted on X to analyze the Squid security incident, stating that sampled analysis revealed all related Safe wallets were single-signature, with different owners. However, the issue was not with private keys, but with a vulnerability in the module (SquidRouterModule) used by these Safe addresses—attackers could forge messages to easily bypass verification and initiate subsequent exchange operations to transfer funds from the target Safe wallets. Additionally, Yu Xian disclosed information the attacker’s profit accumulation addresses. Previously, a third-party Gnosis Safe module exploited on Base and Ethereum resulted in approximately $3.2 million in losses, affecting 86 Gnosis Safe wallets that had added this contract as a trusted Safe Module. The contract is named “SquidRouterModule” on Basescan. Subsequently, Squid clarified that it was not affected by the Gnosis Safe-related vulnerability incident.
The full story
This article is one source in a clustered incident — the cluster page carries the summary, timeline and every other outlet covering it.
