Skip to content
Over 40% of Charities Unprepared for Cyber-Attacks, Survey Reveals

Over 40% of Charities Unprepared for Cyber-Attacks, Survey Reveals

First seen 26 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTC • •

Article Content

Browse articles
ThreatCluster AI
ThreatCluster •October 26, 2026 at 19:33 UTC
  • •42% of charity governance professionals report limited cyber-attack preparedness.
  • •76% of charity boards lack adequate AI risk management capabilities.
  • •Financial resilience is a top concern for charities, impacting cybersecurity focus.

A recent survey by the Chartered Governance Institute of UK & Ireland found that over 40% of charity governance professionals reported their organizations have 'limited or non-existent' preparedness for cyber-attacks. The survey, which included 319 governance professionals, highlighted that charity boards are the least equipped to handle artificial intelligence (AI) risks, with 76% indicating limited or absent capability in this area. Additionally, one-third of respondents noted their boards have no meaningful capacity to address AI risks. The findings suggest that many charity boards are struggling to keep up with developments in AI and cybersecurity, with financial pressures further complicating their ability to prepare. The report calls for policymakers and regulators to provide more practical support to help charities enhance their governance capabilities against these risks.

Start a free Starter trial for enhanced analysis

Ask AI about this cluster

More articles in this cluster (2)

Common questions

What percentage of charities are unprepared for cyber-attacks?
Over 40% of charity governance professionals reported limited or non-existent preparedness for cyber-attacks.
How do charities compare to companies in cyber preparedness?
Charities are significantly less prepared than companies, with only one in 22 company governance experts reporting poor preparedness.
What are the main challenges faced by charity boards?
Charity boards face challenges in expertise for AI risks and financial pressures that compete for their time and resources.