Skip to content
Tina Peters Pushes for Election Security Overhaul Amid Controversy

Tina Peters Pushes for Election Security Overhaul Amid Controversy

First seen 20 Oct 2026, 13:48 UTC •

Article Content

Browse articles
ThreatCluster AI
ThreatCluster •October 20, 2026 at 22:21 UTC
  • •Tina Peters is pushing for emergency scrutiny of voting machines before the midterms.
  • •The '100-Day Risk Mitigation Election Plan' aims to change election security protocols.
  • •Experts doubt the legality of the proposed emergency measures.

Tina Peters, a former Colorado election clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines, is advocating for the Trump administration to utilize emergency powers to scrutinize voting machines before the upcoming midterms. Peters has gained significant access to government officials, including meetings at the White House and Justice and Commerce departments. Alongside other election deniers, she presented a '100-Day Risk Mitigation Election Plan' to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), urging a shift from ballot-marking devices to hand-marked paper ballots. This proposal aims to influence the election process amidst concerns from Trump supporters that the administration may not act on their suggestions. Experts have expressed skepticism about the legality of these proposed actions, indicating that they may not be feasible under current laws.

Start a free Starter trial for enhanced analysis

Ask AI about this cluster

Updated just now How this analysis works

Timeline

2026-10-13
Tina Peters meets with government officials
Peters has visited Washington multiple times, meeting with senior officials at key departments regarding election security.
VoteBeat
2026-10-20
Peters and activists present election plan
A group of election deniers, including Peters, submitted a '100-Day Risk Mitigation Election Plan' to CISA, proposing significant changes to election processes.
Media Matters

More articles in this cluster (2)

Common questions

What is the '100-Day Risk Mitigation Election Plan'?
It is a proposal by Tina Peters and other activists urging CISA to implement changes to election security protocols before the midterms.
What actions is Tina Peters advocating for?
Peters is pushing for the Trump administration to use emergency powers to scrutinize voting machines across the country.
Are these proposals legally viable?
Experts have raised concerns about the legality of the proposed emergency measures, suggesting they may not be permissible under current laws.