Itbrief Cloudsmith Survey Reveals SBOM Gaps Ahead of EU Cyber Resilience Act
Article Content
- •Only 25% of engineering teams automatically generate and verify SBOMs.
- •44% of respondents experienced security incidents from third-party dependencies in the past year.
- •31% spend 10 hours or less monthly on oversight of AI-generated code.
A recent Cloudsmith survey indicates that most engineering teams are unprepared for the EU Cyber Resilience Act's requirements regarding software bills of materials (SBOMs). Only 25% of engineering teams automatically generate and verify SBOMs at every build, while 74% would struggle to produce comprehensive reports for audits. The survey, which included 505 professionals from the US and UK, found that 44% experienced security incidents due to third-party dependencies in the past year. Additionally, 31% of respondents spend 10 hours or less monthly on validating AI-generated code, and only 17% are confident that AI does not introduce new vulnerabilities. The findings highlight significant operational burdens and risks associated with third-party dependencies and AI-generated code, especially with the impending regulatory demands of the Cyber Resilience Act, which requires detailed assessments within 48 hours of a breach.
Ask AI about this cluster
Answers cite the sources they use
Timeline
More articles in this cluster (2)
Continue Reading
Exploitation of Claude API Keys Enables Covert Remote Control Attacks Darktrace researchers demonstrated that compromised Claude API keys can turn Claude Code agents into remote-controlled implants. This method involves leveraging the memory stores feature of Anthropic’s Claude platform, allowing attackers to execute commands and exfiltrate data without relying on vulnerabilities in the…