Skip to content
Cloudsmith Survey Reveals SBOM Gaps Ahead of EU Cyber Resilience Act

Cloudsmith Survey Reveals SBOM Gaps Ahead of EU Cyber Resilience Act

First seen 10 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC

Article Content

Browse articles
ThreatCluster AI
ThreatCluster April 10, 2026 at 22:31 UTC
  • Only 25% of engineering teams automatically generate and verify SBOMs.
  • 44% of respondents experienced security incidents from third-party dependencies in the past year.
  • 31% spend 10 hours or less monthly on oversight of AI-generated code.

A recent Cloudsmith survey indicates that most engineering teams are unprepared for the EU Cyber Resilience Act's requirements regarding software bills of materials (SBOMs). Only 25% of engineering teams automatically generate and verify SBOMs at every build, while 74% would struggle to produce comprehensive reports for audits. The survey, which included 505 professionals from the US and UK, found that 44% experienced security incidents due to third-party dependencies in the past year. Additionally, 31% of respondents spend 10 hours or less monthly on validating AI-generated code, and only 17% are confident that AI does not introduce new vulnerabilities. The findings highlight significant operational burdens and risks associated with third-party dependencies and AI-generated code, especially with the impending regulatory demands of the Cyber Resilience Act, which requires detailed assessments within 48 hours of a breach.

Start a free Starter trial for enhanced analysis

Ask AI about this cluster

Updated 166d ago How this analysis works

Timeline

2026-04-09
Cloudsmith releases 2026 Artifact Management Report
2026-04-10
Itbrief publishes article on Cloudsmith survey findings

More articles in this cluster (2)