Storyboard18 Delhi High Court Rules on Customer Negligence in Cyber Fraud Cases
Article Content
- •Customers clicking suspicious links are deemed negligent by the Delhi High Court.
- •The court's ruling emphasizes that negligence includes ignoring security warnings.
- •Banks are not liable for losses if customers fail to protect their credentials.
The Delhi High Court ruled that customers who ignore security warnings and click on suspicious links cannot hold banks liable for losses due to cyber fraud. This decision arose from a case involving a customer who lost ₹2.6 lakh after clicking a phishing link. The court emphasized that customer negligence extends beyond sharing OTPs or login credentials to include interactions with suspicious links. The ruling overturned a previous decision that favored the customer, highlighting the importance of vigilance in digital banking. The Reserve Bank of India's 2017 guidelines were cited, indicating that banks are not liable if customers act negligently. The case underscores the shared responsibility between banks and customers in preventing cyber fraud.
Ask AI about this cluster
Answers cite the sources they use
Timeline
More articles in this cluster (3)
Continue Reading
Critical WSO2 API Manager Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation A critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-5430) in WSO2 API Manager is being actively exploited, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge admin tokens via JWT authentication bypass. This flaw, which has a CVSS score of 10.0, affects multiple WSO2 products including API Manager, Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, and API…
Critical Linux Kernel Vulnerability CVE-2025-39682 Under Active Exploitation A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-39682) in the Linux kernel allows remote code execution through mishandling of zero-length TLS records. This flaw affects kTLS-enabled hosts running vulnerable kernel versions, exposing them to attackers without authentication. CISA added this vulnerability to its Known Exploited…