Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Protections for Phishing Victims

Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Protections for Phishing Victims

First seen 12 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC www.vrt.bewww.tijd.be 71% similarity 24.9

Article Content

Browse articles
ThreatCluster

The Belgian Hof van Cassatie has redefined 'gross negligence' in phishing cases, mandating banks to compensate victims unless they can prove the victim acted in a way that no reasonable customer would. This ruling overturns a previous decision that deemed a victim 'grossly negligent'. Minister Rob Beenders emphasizes that banks must adhere to the law, which requires them to refund unauthorized transactions. The ruling aims to protect consumers from unjust losses due to phishing attacks. It highlights the need for clearer definitions in legal contexts regarding online fraud. This decision may lead to more frequent compensations for victims of phishing scams.

Key Points: • The Hof van Cassatie redefined 'gross negligence' in phishing cases. • Banks must compensate victims unless they prove gross negligence. • Minister Beenders urges banks to comply with legal obligations.

ThreatCluster AI

Timeline

2025-01-01
Previous ruling deemed victim grossly negligent
A Brussels court ruled that a phishing victim was grossly negligent, which was later overturned by the Hof van Cassatie.
VRT
2025-06-01
Hof van Cassatie ruling issued
The court defined 'gross negligence' in phishing cases, impacting how banks handle compensation claims.
VRT
2026-07-12
Minister Beenders responds to ruling
Minister Beenders calls on banks to follow the law and not leave phishing victims unsupported.
VRT

Community

Browse all →